India and the substantial percentage of countries around the world have at least in principle recognize the enviable position enjoyed by the rights of the citizens in the present day society. Though by and large administrative action is discretionary and is based on subjective satisfaction, however, the administrative authority must act fairly, impartially and reasonable. Administrative law is the body of law that governs the activities of administrative agencies of government. This is an excellent example of the interweaving of ideas about institutional competence and the notion of purpose to build an argument about the bounds of judicial deference. I judicial control of administrative actions by writs. It is on this foundation that indian the indian courts have built the superstructure of the control mechanism. Agency action committed to judicial discretion recall that section 702 of the administrative procedure act says. Dec 21, 2012 administrative law includes within its study the control mechanism by which the administrative agencies are kept within bounds and made effective in the service of the individuals. Court can check all administrative works on the certain grounds. Administrative law also provides for control over administrative action. Markose, judicial control of administrative of india. The courts, through writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, certiorari, prohibitio and quo warranto, control administrative action. Administrative law is body of reasonable limitations and affirmative action parameter, which are developed, and operationalised by the legislature and the courts to.
Abuse of administrative discretion legal services india. The duty to give reason includes thres e basic qualification fosr the perso inn nee odf the reasons. Government agency action can include rule making, adjudication, or the enforcement of a specific regulatory agenda. Common professional learning assigns the problems of administrative law, defined as lawyers view the subject. Some important aspects other than writs also provided to the constitution of india for the judicial control the administrative action in india. Judicial control over administrative process objectives of. Normally the legislature is entrusted with the job of making laws but in complex and stressful conditions of the modern society,the state is caught up with many things at one time and is not able to concentrate and study a particular issue properly leads to a situation of delegated legislation or delegation. Limitations of judicial control of administrative action essay. The increased power of the administration judicial control has become an important area of administrative law. Forms of the judicial control courts during the inspection of the work of administration, actually do the control of the legality of administrative acts, which control. The study of judicial control would be rather incomplete without discussing its limitations. The article discusses the doctrine of legitimate expectation, public accountability and doctrine of proportionality.
A court is bound to follow the rules of evidence and procedure while a quasijudicial authority is free from such requirements 3. The source of administrative law is the statutes, statutory instruments, precedents and customs. Pdf judicial control over administration and protect the. Administrative action is the residuary action which is neither legislative nor judicial. Merely because the court may feel that the administrative action is not justified on. The administrative law deals with composition and powers of different organs of administration, the procedure with the administrative authorities shall adopt in the exercise of their powers and the various modes of control including particularly judicial control over the different kinds of powers exercised by the administrative authorities.
In general, a court will have the power to set aside quash a decision made. Jaffe, judicial control of administrative action 57273, 576 1965. It has no procedural obligations of collecting evidence and weighing argument. Administrative actions may be controlled by the courts by issuing different writs under different circumstances in india. Judicial control of administrative actions through writs the role of writs. Human rights and judicial control of administrative action 75 2.
Ii judicial control of administrative action by other than writs. All the administrative actions are not subject to judicial control. Limitations of judicial control of administrative action. Sep 14, 2017 administrative discretion and judicial control of administrative action ch06. There are two types of control judicial and none judicial over the administrative authorities. White explains the importance of judicial control and says, the system of formal. Arbitrariness as a ground of judicial control over administrative action arbitrariness in law in article 14 of the indian constitution there is a mandate that the state shall not deny equality before law and equal protection of laws to any person within the territory of india. To fair and reasonable administrative action that is allowed by the law. Judicial control of administrative actions through writs the.
Judicial control of administrative authorities in europe sigma oecd. Provisions of fundamental rights in the constitutions of india, pakistan and bangladesh and the roleof judiciary 86 2. In re tolling of time requirements imposed by rules promulgated by the supreme court and use of technology whereas, on march 9, 2020, the governor of ohio issued executive order 202001d and declared a state of emergency in ohio in response to covid. Appeal, on the other hand, means that the superior administrative tribunal or court to whom appeal lies under the law. Judicial control of administrative actions through writs. It is concerned with the treatment of a particular. Administrative law includes within its study the control mechanism by which the administrative agencies are kept within bounds and made effective in the service of the individuals. Judicial control of administrative action louis leventhal. Judicial control of administrative action, jaffe, louis leventhal on. A person aggrieved by an agency decision or other act may challenge its illegality in the courts. Jan 19, 2017 agency action committed to judicial discretion recall that section 702 of the administrative procedure act says. Without some kind of judicial power to control the administrative authorities, there is a danger that they may commit excess and degenerate into arbitrary authorities, and such a development would be inimical to a democratic constitution and the concept of rule of law. Just administrative action section 33 of the constitution 1 everyone has the right to administrative action that is lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair. Administrative law also includes the control mechanism by which the administrative agencies are kept within bounds and made effective in the service of the individuals.
Court has also a limited power to control administrative actions. It has origin in england which was adopted in common law countries. The first inquiry is that of examining the competence of a particular body to create laws, rules, regulations and guidelines among others. Administrative actions march 27, 2020 cite as 03272020 administrative actions, 2020ohio1166. It is concerned with the treatment of a particular situation and is devoid of generality. What is the control mechanism of administrative law. Thus, much work has to be done within both the institutional and. Court may quash an administrative action on the ground of ultra vires in following situations. An administrative action is controlled by courts through the writs of habeous corpus, mandamus, certiorari. Courts through issuing different writs playing a vital role in the judicial control of administrative actions in india. Thus this control acts as a limitation on nasty abuses of power. Judicial control of administrative activity and advantages. One of the most significant parts guaranteed by our constitution is fundamental rights. Cir decision delegation denied determination discretion dissenting district court doctrine due process.
477 584 1193 937 188 1057 527 1366 5 40 1157 375 791 1209 982 149 1219 375 395 1295 1218 1551 495 1366 671 188 1649 1649 625 1328 730 245 699 528 1493 929 580 1021